what happened to little ricky of the partridge family

Who came up with the idea for that child in the 4th flavor of The Partridge Family?

Discussion in 'Visual Arts' started by Hutch, October nineteen, 2014.

Thread Status:
Non open up for further replies.
  1. Hutch

    Hutch Forum Resident Thread Starter

    ...and Ruben's mustache (ala Starsky & Hutch season 4)?

    Goodness gracious. Was that the head of the studio's grandson or something? And the idea that a 4 year old kid wrote those songs is crazy. Was he a prodigy or did someone simply not desire royalties to songs they wrote?

    Likewise it seems they did some cover songs in that flavour that didn't make it to tape.

  2. Good question, and you should be nominated for the all-time thread championship award......
  3. He was Cousin Oliver before Cousin Oliver.
  4. Co-ordinate to Wikipedia, the casting on the show was aggress with problems from the first flavor:

    At the end of the first season, Jeremy Gelbwaks' family moved out of the Los Angeles area, and the office of Chris was recast with actor Brian Forster. According to David Cassidy, Gelbwaks "had a personality conflict with every person in the cast and the producers". A dog named "Simone" was featured in the get-go season, only was phased out during the 2d season. At the beginning of the fourth season, a 4-year-quondam neighbor named Ricky Stevens (Ricky Segall) was featured and would sing a children's song during each episode, simply was dropped mid-season.

    By and large when this kind of thing happens -- replacing actors or adding new characters -- the ratings are going down and the producers are reacting to force per unit area from the network to alter the testify to make information technology more popular again. History has shown that this rarely works.

  5. zen

    zen Senior Member

    I practice recall when that iv-year-old neighbor sang....the T.V. was turned off (usually mid song).
  6. Muzyck

    Muzyck Existent inventor of the inverted firkin

    Isn't this the indicate where Fonzie jumps the shark?
  7. I wonder which fails more often: replacing/introducing new characters or having two characters become married.
  8. Or the infamous "Moonlighting" rule: the sexual tension immediately dissipates the moment the two characters actually have sex. Better to go on them apart forever to continue the disharmonize going.

    The former JumpTheShark.com website had several dozen horrible TV show premises that unremarkably indicated a show was in trouble and was trying to desperately liven things upwards:

    • the family trip to Hawaii
    • somebody getting married
    • new (younger) character introduced because the older characters got un-beautiful
    • a huge guest star who has nothing to do with the show (normally promoting a new hitting song or album)
    • major cast modify introducing a new character from out of nowhere
    • major cast alter replacing an existing character (normally because the original histrion was difficult or wanted more money)
    • the all-musical episode where the entire bandage tries to sing
    • a "dream" episode where one person imagines an entire story, usually one with bizarre, testify-shifting elements
    • the reveal that many previous episodes were all dreams (meet: Roseanne and Dallas)
    • the "It's a Wonderful Life" episode, where one graphic symbol imagines what information technology would have been like if he or she had never existed
    • massive appearance change (I'thou reminded of the fourth dimension Felicity cut her pilus)
    • i grapheme hits their head and has amnesia (done about 600 times on Gilligan'due south Island).

    There's a million of 'em. Most of these are jaw-droppingly stupid, and to tell you the truth, I think they rarely work.

  9. and those "very special episodes of...."
  10. There'south also the Charlie's Angels example: permit's alter an affections every twelvemonth to become publicity virtually our search. Never mind we are losing viewers because our stories aren't very skillful.
  11. Amazing list, merely the family unit trip to Hawaii really sticks out in my mind. I tin think of a specific example off the top of my head, but having been raised in front of the television through the 60s and 70s it seems like the family trip to Hawaii was used dozens of times.
    EdgardV and Vidiot similar this.
  12. Or in the case of Baywatch, motility the unabridged show to Hawaii, because financially strapped communities are so will to transport lifeguards for training in America's nigh distant, expensive state.
  13. Perfect.Oh, I hated those. I wonder who was the first to say that. "Tonight, on a very special episode of blah-blah show..." Cosby peradventure? I can't remember for a fact if they ever did this in the 1970s.

    Actually, scratch that: I can think recording Ernie Anderson on a promo where he actually said "this night, on a very special episode of whatever," and that would've been tardily 1979/early 1980.

  14. "Blow it out your ass!" said trivial Ricky! :D

    [​IMG]

  15. I think in that instance, they had some actresses who quit to make a lot more money elsewhere, like Farah Fawcett. So it wasn't always the producers' idea. Or you had a dispute like the Three's Visitor case with Suzanne Somers, where she wanted a huge raise and the producers froze her out, somewhen compelling her to go out.
  16. Darryl

  17. when people complain today's tv is bad they need to watch this to give them a sense of perspective.
  18. Or mayhap the Brady Brunch Hour
  19. Partridge Family was a very, very bad evidence in terms of one-act. It was a classic in a sense, but I was always kind of bewitched that they ripped-off the entire idea of the Cowsills and just recreated that group with the same kind of music and screwed the original people.That was a show that went beyond very bad all the way to horrible. Unbelievably bad. I actually worked on the (very shortlived) Brady Bunch show where the daughters all got married. What was it called? The Brady Daughters? Something like that. Luckily, I've blanked a lot of them out.
  20. This is aureate compared to well-nigh stuff on tv today.
  21. Also add when the master couple ("Mad Most You lot" for example) have a baby.
  22. They should have just focused more than on Susan Dey's character — ah... ahem, that may have actually worked!

    Besides the remainder of the lame elements of the show, I always thought that the not-band music for the show was unbelievably lame and predictable, almost generic. How ironic on a program with music equally a supposed central premiss. A huge missed opportunity.

    Last edited: October twenty, 2014
  23. Although... they did that in I Honey Lucy and it became one of the most memorable shows in TV history. So I call back it's possible for a sitcom to have a "baby" episode and non completely go to hell. In that specific case, Lucille Brawl really got pregnant in existent life, so it was virtually incommunicable to ignore it in the show, since she was in 90% of every scene.
Thread Status:
Not open up for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine

castorgreaver.blogspot.com

Source: http://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/who-came-up-with-the-idea-for-that-kid-in-the-4th-season-of-the-partridge-family.387688/

0 Response to "what happened to little ricky of the partridge family"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel